In crisis? Samaritans 116 123 (24/7) · CALM 0800 58 58 58 Men's Advice Line 0808 801 0327 You are not alone. If you are in immediate danger, call 999.

Scott Schedule response template — how judges expect allegations answered

✓ Reviewed by Sean McNamara on 2026-09-04 · Sources: official government and court-service pages linked below · Last full review 2026-09-04

A Scott Schedule is a table the court uses to manage allegations — each allegation numbered in its own row, with the applicant's account and the respondent's response side by side. Used in FL401 findings hearings and private-law children cases. A disciplined schedule is the single highest-leverage document a self-representing father can produce.

The format

№Allegation (as pleaded)Respondent's responseExhibit
1Allegation text — date, place, what is claimedYour factual answer: admit / deny / partially accept + one-line reasonC1, C2… (your numbered bundle refs)

The seven rules of response

  1. Answer every row An unanswered allegation stands effectively unchallenged — the court may treat it as accepted.
  2. Lead with the position First sentence: "Denied." / "Denied, as set out below." / "I do not recall; I do not accept the account as pleaded." Precision about your own position first.
  3. Facts, dates, exhibits — no adjectives "Her message of 14:22 (C7) says the child was 'at her sister's'; the school register (C9) marks him present at 08:50." Not: "she lies constantly."
  4. Quote in context Selective quoting is the applicant's main weapon; the full thread is yours. Exhibit the whole exchange, flag the exact lines.
  5. Concede the small true points Credibility is a budget. Conceding "I was 20 minutes late; the messages (C11) explain why" buys belief for your denials of the serious points.
  6. No counter-allegations in the response column If you have your own allegations, they go through the court's process (your own schedule/application) — not jammed into response cells.
  7. Sign the truth statement Your schedule ends with a statement of truth. Everything in it must be something you can say under cross-examination.

Worked micro-example — Row 3: "On 12 June he shouted at me in front of the children." Response: "Denied. I attended at 17:40 to return the children (my message 17:12, C14). The conversation lasted under five minutes and concerned school shoes. No third party was present. I have no independent recollection of shouting; I deny doing so." — note the structure: denial, verified facts, honesty about recollection.

Building the exhibit bundle behind it

  1. Number every document C1, C2… in date order; paginate PD27A-style (PD 27A mechanics).
  2. One chronology page up front — structure here.
  3. Every schedule cell cites only bundle numbers, never loose descriptions.

EvidenceCanvas exists for exactly this workflow: messages in, chronology and numbered Scott Schedule response out.

Before your hearing

Turning scattered messages, notes and dates into evidence takes structure. apply this guide to your own documents — EvidenceCanvas is a guided toolkit that helps you draft a child-focused witness statement, answer a Scott Schedule point by point, and assemble a paginated court bundle. It is not a law firm and does not give legal advice.

See how EvidenceCanvas works

Legal Services Act 2007: we provide unregulated procedural information only. We do not conduct litigation, represent anyone, or offer legal advice. Family court proceedings involving children are confidential (FPR Part 12; s.12 Administration of Justice Act 1960). This site publishes no case details, party names, or user content.

Are you a McKenzie friend, family-law consultant or solicitor? Get listed on this page →